Three out of four Nevada county sheriffs agree, Question 1 on the November ballot, the Nevada Background Checks for Gun Purchases Initiative, should be voted down, because it will do nothing to prevent gun violence, will be too costly and merely put honest people in jeopardy of running afoul of a nitpicking law.
The National Rifle Association reports opposition to Question 1 has been announced by Sheriff Ken Furlong (Carson City), Sheriff Ben Trotter (Churchill County), Sheriff Ron Pierini (Douglas County), Sheriff Jim Pitts (Elko County), Sheriff Keith Logan (Eureka County), Sheriff Ron Unger (Lander County), Sheriff Kerry Lee (Lincoln County), Sheriff Al McNeil (Lyon County), Sheriff Sharon Wehrly (Nye County), Sheriff Gerald Antinoro (Storey County), Sheriff Chuck Allen (Washoe County) and Sheriff Mike Allen (Humboldt County).
Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo has chosen to remain neutral and others are silent on the matter.
Most recently, Gov. Brian Sandoval has added his voice to the opposition. ?The governor does not support Question 1. He has concerns that this measure would dilute the legitimate rights of law-abiding Nevadans and that it does not actually address the complex issue of keeping firearms out of the hands of criminals,? said Mari St. Martin, a spokeswoman for the governor.
St. Martin has noted that existing law already prohibits a person from selling or giving a firearm or ammunition to another person if he or she has actual knowledge that the other person is under indictment for or has been convicted of a felony, is a fugitive from justice, has been found mentally ill or is in the country illegally.
Question 1 would require ?universal? background checks and require law enforcement to scrutinize virtually every gun sale or transfer. It is being pushed by Nevadans for Background Checks, which is funded by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg?s Everytown for Gun Safety. It would require most gun transfers to be conducted through a federally licensed firearms dealer.
A summary of the measure reads in part: ?This initiative requires that an unlicensed person who wishes to sell or transfer a firearm to another person conduct the transfer through a licensed gun dealer who runs a background check on the potential buyer or transferee. A licensed dealer may charge a reasonable fee for this service.?
Elko County Sheriff Jim Pitts has been quoted as saying, ?This is for one thing a law that we can?t enforce.
There?s no way of enforcing this. Only the citizens who follow the law are going to be the ones who follow it, and the ones that are the criminals aren?t going to follow it anyway. How are we going to follow it up??
Washoe County Sheriff Chuck Allen said Question 1 infringes upon the Second Amendment and ?will do absolutely nothing to stop criminals while criminalizing the commonplace activities of many Nevada gun owners.?
Carson City Sheriff Kenny Furlong has said, ?Any bill that does not address mental health, which I believe to be the core cause of the violence we?ve had across the country, does not meet my expectations.?
Sheriff Sharon Wehrly in Nye County has said, ?It merely places more restrictions on good people, will make it more difficult, and incur unnecessary costs for law-abiding citizens to manage their personal property.?
A recent survey conducted by Las Vegas television station KTNV in conjunction with Rasmussen Reports found that 65 percent of those polled support the background checks initiative and only 28 percent opposed it with 7 percent undecided.
Perhaps the majority of sheriffs and the governor can help persuade the voters that one more unenforceable law on the books will just add to the regulatory burden and cost and do nothing to increase safety. ? TM