President Trump this past week signed an executive order telling the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers to review the so-called waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule created under the Obama administration, which attempted to usurp dominion over every stream, ditch, wetland or muddy hoof print that might eventually spill a few drops of water into any rivulet that might occasionally be navigable with an inner tube.
?We?re going to free up our country and it?s going to be done in a very environmental and positive environmental way, I will tell you that,? Trump said. ?[We will] create millions of jobs, so many jobs are delayed for so many years that it?s unfair to everybody.?
Trump ordered the federal agencies to review a 2006 opinion by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, that reduced the scope of the act by defining ?waters of the United States? as only permanent bodies of water and not the occasional result of rainfall.
Nevada was one of 23 states to file suit over the WOTUS rule. The Supreme Court ruled this past summer that property owners had a right to sue in court over permitting decisions. The federal agencies had contended property owners could only go to court once decisions were final, but essentially argued that all permitting decisions are reviewable and potentially reversible and therefore never final.
But litigation is expensive and time consuming. Heading off the designation to begin with is a better solution.
Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt, whose office pressed the federal lawsuit on behalf of the state, said of Trump?s executive order: ?The waters of the United States rule proposed by the former administration would drastically expand federal authority over state and local waters, and I am encouraged that this administration is taking action to ensure that the executive branch?s decisions are in line with congressional intent. We are pleased to see that this administration recognizes what the majority of states have already recognized ? that federal rules like the waters of the United States rule must be interpreted consistently with the intent of Congress, and that specific needs of individual states must be taken into account by federal agencies like the EPA.?
In December 2010, the Hawkes Co. applied for a permit to mine peat on property in Minnesota. More than a year later the Army Corps denied the application, saying the land contained ?water of the United States? because its wetlands had a ?significant nexus? to the Red River of the North, located some 120 miles away.
In the opinion of the court, Chief Justice John Roberts pointed out the definition of WOTUS used by the EPA and the Corps includes ?land areas occasionally or regularly saturated with water ? such as ?mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, [and] playa lakes? ? the ?use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce.? The Corps has applied that definition to assert jurisdiction over ?270-to-300 million acres of swampy lands in the United States ? including half of Alaska and an area the size of California in the lower 48 States.??
Roberts also noted that a specialized individual permit on average costs $271,596 and 788 days to complete. He said the permitting process can be ?arduous, expensive, and long.? He left out futile, since the process never ends.
The Western Congressional Caucus said the EPA spurned public comment and input from the states in the rule making process, ?This is nothing short of a federal seizure of state waters, to the point where very few, if any, water bodies will be left for the states to manage. Water rights, economic growth, and local conservation efforts will suffer. Instead of working with the local officials and state agencies who know their needs the best, citizens will have to depend on a disconnected federal bureaucracy for management of our most precious natural resource: our water.?
Trump is to be applauded for reining in the overreach of the EPA and Corps in grabbing powers never envisioned by Congress. ? TM