There is a bill pending in the Legislature that could have the effect of diluting the state?s voting power in presidential elections.
Assembly Bill 274 would rope Nevada into a compact called the ?Agreement Among the States to Elect the President by National Popular Vote.? Instead of awarding Nevada?s six electoral votes ? one for each representative and senator in Congress ? according to how Nevadans vote, those six electoral voters would be awarded to the president and vice president team that wins the popular vote nationally.
This essentially cuts Nevada?s votes from six to four, since the votes nationwide would be proportional to population and exclude the power of our two senators.
The change would take place when enough states join the compact to constitute a majority of electoral votes, which is 270 of the 538 electoral votes. Thus far enough states have signed on to constitute about 165 electoral votes. But because it is a compact, Congress would have to agree to it as well.
The Constitution leaves it up to each state?s Legislature to decide how to award its electoral votes. Currently all but two states ? Maine and Nebraska ? award all their electoral votes to the statewide winner. Maine and Nebraska award two electoral votes ? equal to the number of its senators ? to the statewide winner, but award one electoral vote to the winner in each congressional district.
AB274 went before the Assembly Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections recently.
Scott Drexel, one of the backers of the popular vote compact, told lawmakers, ?The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The short comings of the current system of electing the president stem from state winner-take-all statutes, that is state laws that award all electoral votes to the candidate receiving the most popular votes in each separate state. The winner-take-all rule has permitted five of our 45 presidents to come into office without having won the most popular votes nationwide.?
Popular vote advocate Saul Anuzis argued before the committee that the current system results in candidates concentrating their campaigns in so-called battleground states instead of trying to sway the most voters nationally.
In response to which Assemblyman Ira Hansen of Sparks noted that in 2016 Nevada was indeed a battleground state. He pointed out Nevadans donated $6.7 million to presidential campaigns, but those campaigns spent $55 million in Nevada, netting substantial revenues for state media outlets and other businesses.
But Anuzis suggested that Nevada may be a fleeting battleground state. It has supported Democrats in the past three presidential elections and backed Bill Clinton twice before siding with George W. Bush twice.
Yes, Hillary Clinton won more popular votes than Donald Trump, but he won more state electors, which is what the Founders envisioned. (Trump won the Electoral College vote by 304 to 227. Clinton won the popular vote by 2.9 million. She won California by 4 million votes. So Trump won the combined popular vote in the rest of the nation.)
Former Nevada Sen. Harry Reid has joined the fray, calling the Electoral College undemocratic.
?I believe that focusing on the Electoral College is important no matter how you do it, because what?s happened this decade, these last several elections, where we have clearly two elections, the Gore election and this election. In this election Hillary Clinton will wind up getting almost 3 million votes more than Trump. It?s time the system goes away. It is very undemocratic,? Reid said in an interview.
Pay no attention to the fact Reid served in the Senate for 30 years, where each state gets two votes no matter the size of its population. Most undemocratic.
The Founders established the nation on a federalist system, not a democracy. Certain enumerated powers were assigned the federal government while the rest were reserved to the states and the people. That is why they created the Senate and ? until 1913?s 17th Amendment ? had state Legislatures pick their senators. That is why the Electoral College gives added weight to smaller states.
If Nevada wishes to assure greater attention and provide a chance for candidates to win votes here, we could adopt a system like that in Maine and Nebraska.
Thomas Mitchell is a longtime Nevada newspaper columnist. You may email him at firstname.lastname@example.org. He also blogs at http://4thst8.wordpress.com/.