Former Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman once threatened to lie down on the tracks to block any rail shipment of nuclear waste to Yucca Mountain. ?We?re going to do whatever it takes, even if we have to lie down in front of the tracks,? Goodman said.
We hear the train acomin?.
This past week the environmental subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee heard testimony on a draft bill that would restart the Yucca Mountain licensing for storage of spent nuclear fuel ? the draft Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2017.
Except for four members of Nevada?s Washington delegation, the majority of the House members discussing the proposal seemed strongly in favor of shipping nuclear waste out of their districts to a hole in the barren desert.
Yucca Mountain was designated as the nation?s sole permanent storage site for 70,000 metric tons of nuclear waste from commercial power plants by a 1987 law. More than $15 billion has been spent drilling miles of tunnels into solid rock and analyzing the site. But President Obama, at the urging of former Sen. Harry Reid, suspended funding for the project and it has since lain fallow.
In addressing the chairman of the subcommittee ? Rep. John Shimkus of Illinois, the driving force behind the draft bill ? Nevada?s senior Sen. Dean Heller testified, ?I appreciate your commitment to ensure that progress is made on this issue; however, I do not believe the bill that is before the committee today ? the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2017 ? is the solution.
?Rather, I believe it is heavy-handed, federal government-only proposal to reinstate Yucca Mountain while making false promises to the residents of Nevada.?
Heller?s mention of ?false promises? appears to be a reference to the ?benefits section? of the draft bill that envisions dollars flowing to the state and local communities, but the dollar amounts are left blank in the draft.
Under existing law, the state loses any potential benefits by challenging the waste dump, but the draft states that a benefits agreement would not constitute or require the state?s consent.
Rep. Ruben Kihuen ? who represents Nye County, where Yucca Mountain is located ? called the project a threat to Las Vegas tourism.
Las Vegas Reps. Dina Titus and Jackie Rosen also testified against the bill.
Rosen stated, ?Using Yucca Mountain as the nation?s dumping ground would require transporting over 70,000 metric tons of radioactive waste, much of it through my district, and through the heart of Las Vegas, a city that attracts over 43 million visitors annually and generates 59 billion dollars in revenue according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.?
But the bill says that ?to the extent practicable? no radioactive waste is to be shipped through Las Vegas. In fact, one proposal would be to be build a transshipment depot near Caliente and then build a rail spur directly to Yucca Mountain through the newly created Basin and Range National Monument ? a job creating endeavor.
Rosen continued, ?Severe transportation accidents threaten the health and safety of tourists and individuals who live along the proposed waste transportation routes, and would cause hundreds of millions of dollars in cleanup costs and related economic losses.?
But an expert witness told the subcommittee there have been 5,000 nuke waste shipments without a single incident.
Though Gov. Brian Sandoval and a majority of the state?s Washington representatives oppose licensing Yucca Mountain, the Nye County Commission had entered into the congressional record a letter supporting Yucca Mountain. The letter states, ?The Yucca Mountain nuclear repository would bring federal dollars to Nevada, create well-paying science and construction jobs, and improve the state?s infrastructure. The project would also strengthen national security, a role Nye County and Nevada has always taken the lead in through the past eight decades.?
A group calling itself NevadansCAN (Conservative Action Network) has joined the debate by suggesting that nuclear waste could be shipped to Yucca Mountain, not for storage for a million years, but for reprocessing, as is done in a number of countries, to create new nuclear fuel that could be sold ? with the proceeds distributed to Nevada citizens in a way similar to how oil proceeds are paid to Alaskans.
If we just shout no and lie down on the tracks, we could get run over.
Thomas Mitchell is a longtime Nevada newspaper columnist. You may email him at email@example.com. He also blogs at http://4thst8.wordpress.com/.